Court Notes
By: Sean Rieger
Shiel v. Rowell (Supreme Court of Massachusetts, July 2018)
Background: The Rowells own the property adjacent to the Shiel property. On the Rowells’ property sits a one-hundred-foot-tall tree with branches reaching and hanging over Shiel’s property. Shiel sued the Rowells with claims of private nuisance and trespass after the tree allegedly caused algae buildup and further damage to Shiel’s roof and the Rowells refused to cut it down. Shiel sought money damages for the damage to her roof and an injunction demanding that the overhanging branches be cut back.
Evidence: The facts apparently determined that the large tree was healthy and did not have any indication that it was unhealthy or would present the foreseeability of imminent harm to the neighbor.
Court Ruling: The court applied a long-standing rule that a landowner may not hold a neighbor liable for damage caused by that neighbor’s healthy trees, Landowners who are disturbed by their neighbor’s trees are not without recourse. A property owner retains the right to remove so much of the tree as overhangs his property.
Bergeson v. W. Frontier Condos HOA, Inc., (Arizona Court of Appeals, Oct. 2020)
Background: In 2005, the owners of a condo unit rented their unit to a tenant. In 2006, with the condo owners’ permission, but without seeking permission from the governing Condo Assoc., or providing any notice what she was doing so, the tenant replaced an over
Operating Agreement – an operating agreement governs the operation of an LLC and the relationship between its members. There are many considerations that go into drafting an operating agreement, particularly if the LLC has multiple members, that should not be left up for decision by an automated program. It is important for an attorney drafting an LLC operating agreement to intimately understand the core business and operations of the LLC and the goals and expectations of each member.
Petition – a petition is the initiating document in a lawsuit. Depending on the claim, Oklahoma law requires the claimant to meet certain pleading standards. For example, it is not enough to allege fraud generally. A claim for fraud, including the surrounding circumstances, must be pled with particularity. Failure to comply with pleading requirements may get your claim dismissed.
Consumers of products from automated legal service companies must be aware of general risks and pitfalls using automatically generated legal documents. While a simple document may be appropriate in some situations, we recommend that as to the four documents listed above a real-life attorney should be consulted.